I'm just saying it's not worth getting heated up about and loosing friendships (and Harris) over because whatever the 'official' story is, it's most likely a bunch of porkies given all the other crap we're fed by corrupt officials and the main stream media.
I don’t know the truth, I’m asking questions and speculating off plausible information that I’ve read which goes against the official statements. Given all the other corrupt doings and staged false flag events conducted by certain secret agencies throughout history, going into sceptical mode before swallowing the official garbage tablet seems logical.
As the documentary shows it’s totally possible to alter someone’s mind by use of a psychiatrist, drugs and hypnotism all of which James Holmes (a former neuroscience graduate student) was being prescribed. The documentary used hypnotism to train someone’s brain to automatically perform the task of conducting a shooting, this was done without drugs, so what’s possible with drugs produced by Big Pharma?
Mind control is not a new thing either, Project MKUltra was started by the CIA’s Scientific Intelligence Division in the 1950’s, so where are they are at now?
Maybe they weren’t false flag events and both these shooters where just loose dudes being prescribed too much medication. But is the main stream media informing, or the court case looking into the likelihood of legal psychiatric drug use or drug withdrawal in their case? Are they telling us anything about Dr. Lynne Fenton, Holmes’ psychiatrist who would have been prescribing him drugs and ‘treatment’? Same goes for Adam Lanza, the kid was on prescription drugs as was numerous other mass shooters. So is the problem gun laws or the pharmaceutical and medical industry and the way mental health issues are treated? Jeez its complex!!
Plenty of people commit violence, suicide and crime because of prescription psychiatric drugs.
This website documents 5000+ cases of such.
The media were given some photos and a court video of James Holmes where he is clearly sedated on drugs. Now even main stream media are reporting that he was ‘out of it’ after the arrest?? WTF is really going on!!??
Despite obvious discrepancies in both stories, of which there is a considerable amount, the official statement is “Don’t waste time trying to figure out what motivated the shooter”, because we don’t want you to.
If you don’t look at any of the material please read this article by Dr Paul Craig Roberts, former Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury and Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal. He smashes agenda driven news, the Sandy stuff starts halfway down the page.
I’ve found a lot of good info if anyone is interested.
‘Knowledge will forever govern ignorance; and a people who mean to be their own governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives.’ James Madison
pulled from Dr Paul Roberts article above:
Consider the Sandy Hook school shooting. This shooting serves as an excuse for “progressives” to express their hatred of guns and the NRA and to advance their gun control agenda. Few if any of those hyperventilating over the tragedy know any of the parents of the murdered children. They have shown no similar response to the US government’s murder of countless thousands of Muslim children. The Clinton regime alone killed 500,000 Iraqi children with illegal sanctions, and Clinton’s immoral secretary of state, a feminist hero, said that she thought the sanctions were worth the cost of one half million dead Iraqi children.
Suddenly, 20 US children become of massive importance to “progressives.” Why? Because the deaths foster their agenda–gun control in the US.
When I hear people talk about “gun violence,” I wonder what has happened to language. A gun is an inanimate object. An inanimate object cannot cause violence. Humans cause violence. The relevant question is: why do humans cause violence? This obvious question seldom gets asked. Instead, inanimate objects are blamed for the actions of humans.
In one of its reports on the Sandy Hook shooting, Time noted that such events “inevitably reopen debates about gun control, or more tenuously lead people to complain about American culture itself. Yet on the very same day, a 36-year-old Chinese man attacked 22 children with a knife at a primary school in China, suggesting that there is a critical factor with mass homicides that gets far less attention.” That factor, “the core of these events,” is mental health and “our failure to address it as a society.”
That factor remains unaddressed, because the agenda-driven media is determined to use the Sandy Hook shootings as a means of achieving gun control. One wonders if there is a “knife control” agenda in China. What follows is not an argument that the report of the Sandy Hook shootings is a hoax. What follows is an argument that suspicions are created when agenda takes precedence over reporting and discrepancies in reports are left unresolved.
Agenda-driven news is the reason that apparent inconsistencies in the Sandy Hook story were not investigated or explained. According to some reports, the medical examiner said the children were shot with a rifle, but other reports say the accused was found dead inside the school with two pistols and that a rifle was found outside in the car. The police capture a man in the woods who says “I didn’t do it.” How would a person in the woods know what has just happened? Who was the man? Was he investigated and released? Will we ever know?
Some reports say the school was locked and admission is via security camera and being buzzed in. Why would a heavily armed person be buzzed in? Other reports say he shot his way in. Why wouldn’t such a commotion have alerted the school?
Another puzzle is the video of a father whose child has supposedly been shot to pieces. Prior to the interview he is caught on camera laughing and joking, and then, like an actor, he pulls his face and voice into a presentation of grief for the interview.
The spokesman for the Connecticut State Police is anxious to control the story, warns social media against posting information contrary to official information, but provides little information, refusing to answer most questions. The usual “ongoing investigation” is invoked, but Lanza has already been declared to be the killer and the number of dead reported. About the only hard information that emerges is that the police are investigating where every component of the weapons was manufactured. The relevance to the shooting of where the components of the weapons were manufactured is not explained.
The medical examiner’s press conference is weird. He is incoherent, unsure of what he is supposed to say, hasn’t answers to questions he should have, and defers to police.
Sandy hook: Unanswered questions and mission information.
Sandy Hook School Massacre Timeline
The Newtown School Tragedy: More than one shooter?
My opinion. The US government is full of a bunch of Yahoos that couldn't keep a secret to save their mother's lives let alone launch some of the intricate conspiracies I hear and read about. They are too fricken greedy and self serving. Incompetent, basically. That's part of the reason the system works pretty well. The rest makes for fun novels of intrigue and exciting Hollywood movies, though. Mike